Elon Musk gets sassy at day 3 of OpenAI trial: "Worst-case situation would be that AI kills us all"

Oakland, California - Elon Musk sparred with lawyers for a third day Thursday at his California trial against OpenAI, struggling to explain why his own for-profit AI empire differs from the one he is trying to take down.

Elon Musk is seen through a window giving a "thumbs up" at the Ronald V. Dellums US Courthouse on Tuesday in Oakland, California.   © AMY OSBORNE / AFP

"Few answers are going to be complete, especially when you cut me off all the time," the visibly irritated multibillionaire said as he resumed his duel Thursday morning with the defense attorney for OpenAI.

Federal Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers, who must decide whether OpenAI – the creator of ChatGPT – betrayed its original nonprofit mission, had to intervene several times to compel the world's richest man to answer questions.

After the judge accused him of playing lawyer by complaining that opposing counsel's questions were "leading," the tech mogul conceded: "I am not a lawyer."

Britney Spears formally charged after DUI arrest – will she face jail time?
Britney Spears Britney Spears formally charged after DUI arrest – will she face jail time?

"Well, technically I did take Law 101 in school," he added, drawing laughter from the courtroom.

A benefactor to OpenAI's co-founders – to whom he gave $38 million during the project's early days from 2015 to 2017 – Musk accuses CEO Sam Altman and his partner Greg Brockman of betraying the startup's charitable mission by transforming it into a commercial company valued at more than $850 billion and poised to go public.

Ad

OpenAI's lawyer points out that Elon Musk has his own for-profit AI company

Demonstrators protest outside the courthouse at the Ronald V. Dellums Federal Building as jury selection begins in the lawsuit between Elon Musk and OpenAI on Monday in Oakland, California.   © BENJAMIN FANJOY / GETTY IMAGES NORTH AMERICA / GETTY IMAGES VIA AFP

OpenAI's attorney William Savitt sought to demonstrate that Musk is a mirror image of what he denounces: all of his companies – Tesla, Neuralink, X, and his own AI firm xAI, recently absorbed into SpaceX – are for-profit, and the entrepreneur himself presents them as beneficial to humanity.

"There's nothing wrong with having a for-profit organization," Musk answered, repeating his mantra: "You just can't steal a charity," meaning OpenAI should simply have started as a normal company from the outset.

"The worst-case situation would be that AI kills us all, I suppose," Musk declared with a smile, seizing an opening from his own attorney to invoke the climactic scenario from the film Terminator.

Olivia Rodrigo drops big world tour announcement ahead of new album
Olivia Rodrigo Olivia Rodrigo drops big world tour announcement ahead of new album

The judge had sought to bar such digressions, telling Musk's attorney at the start of the hearing: "I think it's ironic that your client, despite these risks, is creating a company that's in the exact same space."

When will Sam Altman give testimony in the case?

Musk's testimony concluded Thursday, his third day on the stand, although he could be called back before mid-May.

Altman, his former protégé turned adversary, was present for Thursday's exchanges and left the courthouse shortly after Musk finished.

Altman's testimony is expected next week or the week after. OpenAI President Brockman, another early co-founder, will precede him on the witness stand. A ruling on the merits is expected in mid-May.