Supreme Court hears pivotal migrant asylum case as Trump admin seeks to reinstate "turnback policy"

Washington DC - The US Supreme Court on Tuesday examined a former policy of turning away migrants before they crossed the US-Mexico border to present an asylum claim.

The US Supreme Court on Tuesday examined a former policy of turning away migrants before they crossed the US-Mexico border to present an asylum claim.  © KEVIN DIETSCH / GETTY IMAGES NORTH AMERICA / GETTY IMAGES VIA AFP Photo by KEVIN DIETSCH / GETTY IMAGES NORTH AMERICA / GETTY IMAGES VIA AFP

The policy, known as "metering," has not been in place since 2021, but President Donald Trump is seeking a ruling validating it as legal in the event it may be reinstated.

The policy allowed federal US agents on the Mexican side of the US-Mexico border to turn away potential asylum seekers before they reached US soil.

The Immigration and Nationality Act allows an "alien who is physically present in the United States or who arrives in the United States" to apply for asylum.

Donald Trump "Sleepy Don" trends after Trump caught snoozing at Memphis Task Force Meeting

A divided appeals court ruled in 2024 that this applies to potential asylum seekers at ports of entry "whichever side of the border they are standing on."

The Trump administration is asking the conservative-dominated Supreme Court to reject this interpretation.

The question before the Supreme Court is "whether an alien who is stopped on the Mexican side of the US-Mexico border 'arrives in the United States.'"

Addressing the court on Tuesday, Vivek Suri, an assistant to the solicitor general, said: "You can't arrive in the United States while you're still standing in Mexico. That should be the end of this case."

Suri said that although the "turnback policy" is not currently in place, the administration is seeking a favorable ruling from the Supreme Court in case it wants to use it in the future.

"This is an important tool in the government's toolbox for dealing with border surges when they occur," he said. "It's not something the court should leave to future uncertainty."

Ad

Kelsi Corkran, an attorney for Al Otro Lado, an immigration rights group representing asylum seekers, said it was an 'unusual scenario" to have "officers standing there (on the Mexican side of the border) and turning people back."

"I think it's important to remember that from 1917 to 2016 – 99 years – there was not a single example of a turnback," Corkran said. "People would come through the port. At that point, when they were in the port, they would be inspected, and processing would happen."

More on Migration: